« Where's the Branded Content? Why OPA Research Falls Short | Main | Hey Content Publishers - Custom Media Day 2010 NYC is Coming »

June 22, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834c5f4b969e2013484c0ba59970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 7 Reasons NOT to do Content Marketing:

Comments

John

Good article -- I especially agree with the point about content like all the rest. It seems as though somewhere along the road "more is better" became everything with content marketing.

Too many marketers just jump over each other to try and grab specific keywords.

It really leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I am looking for something, and it is just the exact same points everyone else is making regurgitated over and over again.

Hans de Groot

You are wrong, Joe

It should be '7 Problems You Have To Solve Before You Are Able To Do Great Content Marketing'.

Read your book! :)

Jon Buscall

I totally agree with the "No executive buy-in". It can be hard to persuade the C-suite that eyeballs / visitors aren't as effective as genuine connections with content. Old school interruptive marketing still has a lot of true believers out there.

Good metrics are a way of persuading the C-suite so I think us content marketers need to embrace the geekier side of online marketing to help persuade.

Great post!

Larry

Absolutely agree that tactics without a strategy are worse than nothing at all. But....Would you agree that it's a good idea to get started before the strategy is completely fleshed out? You can establish a presence, and then develop and refine the strategy as you go -- and as you receive feedback from the community.

Mark Delfeld

Great point Jon,
I recommend Charlene Li's recent book "Open Leadership" on this subject. Basic premise is that for Social Media to make an impact senior management needs to open up more.

I somewhat disagree with the reason #7. For social media (or content marketing) to work, the internal SME's need to be brought into the fold to help produce relevant content.

I believe 4, 5 and 6 could be lumped into the category of firms that produce content but don't map it the needs of the customer. If content isn't linked to a high priority need that the company can solve, its irrelevant except for branding purposes...

Joe Pulizzi

@Jon...thanks and good points.

@Larry...yes, I believe you are right for a small company or startup. Larger businesses need to develop this as part of their marketing plan.

@Mark, good points. I see your point on making sure the process is integrated internally. Indeed it should...but we are seeing a number of organizations benefit substantially from managing editors and content experts to guide them as they transform their marketing departments into publishing departments.

Nice discussion!

Daniella Santos

This is an interesting post! I like how you enumerated points of what a content marketing is about. There may be people who uses such strategy, because they think of how it can help their business. This will help a lot of people, especially those who just use this strategy because of its efficiency and not how it really works.

Arthur Charles Van Wyk

One that I would add is:
You are unable to conduct a normal conversation (chronic academics for example)and therefore unable to communicate conversationally..

At the same time I'd like to say that the opportunity exist to diseminate content,market to and build a community of these drone-like people, because that there is itself a niche.

Pawan Deshpande

I have written a blog based off of this one entitled "6 Reasons why Content Curation May Not be for you:

http://www.contentcurationmarketing.com/articles/11618/6-reasons-why-content-curation-tools-may-not-be-fo/

If you are considering using content curation as a part of your content marketing strategy, you may find my post relevant.

Nenad

Great points, Joe. Lately I've encountered most of what you wrote here.
#3 - an organisation is thinking of quitting publishing its 16 year-old custom monthly due to current financial troubles despite it is its most recognisable brand!

#5 I am still receiving custom magazines that are a hybrid between content marketing and plain internal magazine with babies and puppies and has nothing to do w/ helping their customers/readers, rather it's more about #6, and they absolutely sincerely believe that is how it's supposed to be done. Regarding #6, in a costum magazine we published (for a reason, described in the strategy, concept of the magazine and that specific issue) a really top-notch interview that any magazine would be more than proud of, however the company complained that they (by name ...) haven't been mentioned at all in the interview published in their own magazine! It hurt them a lot!

But the upgrade to your post, dear Joe, is what I am having trouble with, would be how to "persuade" companies they should change their behavior/actions/way of thinking?

Joe Pulizzi

Nenad...very interesting indeed.

To answer your question with a question...how are they measuring their activities based on their marketing goals? In my experience, the only way to persuade companies is to base it on as many facts as possible. For example, if we can tell what the readership is of their puppies and babies article, we can measure the engagement of that article versus the other, more relevant articles. Can that be done?

Mick Dickinson

Excellent post, as ever. Reason #3 is the one that is driving me crazy ATM. Getting budget to fulfil a runway of content - a content calendar - seems more difficult then getting buy-in to the idea of marketing with content. Keep on keepin' on!

John Jenkins

Great post.

I especially agree with #6. When you promote your own products you are advertising (taking) not content marketing (giving).

Unfortunately most companies don't have any grasp on the law of reciprocity.

Jorge Sandrini

This is an excellent post, mainly because it is so relevant to the real issues faced by marketers attempting to launch and manage successful content marketing programs. I personally have found that executive buy-in is extremely important if not THE most important element, because once you secure that, the resources organizational become more available to carry-out the rest. Without it, you can only hope to limp along.

Roger Wilson

One real reason not to do (too much) content marketing is that content selling might be more cost effective. At one point in my career I did a quarterly newsletter in my field of event marketing but spent most of my time working directly with prospects. A buyer once told me that "its not what you sell me but what you tell me that is important." Telling not selling thus became a motto.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Subscribe Now



Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Get The Book

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog Widget by LinkWithin

    About Joe


    • Joe Pulizzi is a leading author, speaker and strategist for content marketing. Joe, founder of content matching site Junta42, is co-author of Get Content Get Customers. This blog looks at the trends in content marketing, and how marketers can learn to think and act like publishers.

    Joe's Rankings