- by guest blogger Michael Buller
This is Michael's second guest blog post. We received such a great response from the first one, we asked him to post again. Thanks Michael. - Joe Pulizzi
CVS made news recently with the announcement of a new custom
publication Great Health Magazine,
which they aim to launch this spring. The publication, which will also have a
“sister web site” and eventually an enewsletter, will be centered around health
issues. On the surface, there’s no doubting the numbers that make a compelling
case for the relevance:
- Women influence 80% of healthcare decisions in
their households, wielding buying power of about $1.2 trillion.
- The initial mail list will be 500,000, picked from
the 75 million people who have signed up for the CVS ExtraCare card. That list
will double to 1,000,000 in 2009.
- The average reader will be a mid-50s college
educated woman, who owns her own home and still works to support her family.
So there’s little doubt that the women who receive this
publication are predisposed to care about the subject matter. And there’s
little doubt that with demographics like this, advertisers would love to talk
to this target audience. But here’s the catch: there’s no truth to the saying,
“if you mail it, they will read it.”
Reaching a desired
demographic is one thing; getting them to engage in the publication is another.
Based on that reasoning, I’m skeptical. More than just about
any other family-friendly topic, healthcare content is pervasive – online, in
print, you name it. A Google search on women’s health returns 36,500,000
results. You don’t need SRDS to see how saturated the category is ‑ just visit
any newsstand and look at the women’s magazine section; you’ll be inundated
with cover lines selling health stories. Cutting through that clutter to get
readers to not only pick up the publication, but actually spend time with it –
that’s a tall order.
I hope CVS succeeds – a successful custom magazine by anyone
helps all of us in the industry – but I’m worried that the content will be so generic
and/or brand-centric that it will fail to capture anyone’s attention.
Even if it does, there’s another major hurdle to battle.
There’s nothing in the press release or news that indicates that CVS is funding the
endeavor – but it does say that the company hopes to attract ad revenue from
pharmaceutical and OTC advertisers. It’s likely that they’re counting on
advertisers to flock to their alluring demographics. But what if cautious
advertisers wait until the magazine proves that it is engaging readers – will
CVS have the financial fortitude to invest in the publication during that time?
Or will they impatiently demand a return on their investment from the start? Or
worse, have they convinced a small custom publisher that the publisher should
take all the risk in launching this venture, with the promise of big ad revenue
returns down the line?
I hope not – that happens
too often where marketers want both a content marketing program that engages
their customers, and the luxury of someone else paying for that program.
Basic Media Group is the company that’s signed on for the
CVS magazine. On March 18, their one-page website said: “Updated website coming
soon.” Hmm.

Michael Buller is Vice President/General Manager of Custom Publishing for The Pohly Company, a diversified marketing and publishing services company specializing in engagement marketing and customer communications.
To
subscribe to more quality content like this post, receive
the email update or get the RSS
feed!
Recent Comments